jim.shamlin.com

15: Linking Customers and Marketers with Value Propositions

The value proposition of a product is central to the brand relationship: it represents the benefit for which customers are paying (in terms of time and effort as well as money), and is the core reason they seek to enter a relationship with a brand. Advertising and image cannot compensate for a lack of a compelling value proposition.

The author also suggests that the value proposition must be unique for the company, and consistent for all markets. (EN: I don't think this is necessarily true. A unique value proposition isn't a necessity, as commodity products can be profitable, but uniqueness is a strong competitive advantage in a competitive market. Also, different markets may have different uses for a product - baking soda is used in many different ways and each user-market is wholly indifferent with its values to the other markets - so it need no be consistent, though conflicting messaging is a Bad Thing.)

DEVELOPING THE VALUE PROPOSITION

The value proposition includes functional as well as non-functional benefits that provide value to the customer.

The functional benefit is often directly related to the use of a product (a car provides transportation), but there may also be non-functional benefits that are less concrete (a stylish car makes a person feel important, an efficient one makes them feel smart, a car with a good reputation makes them feel safe, etc.).

Especially in terms of nonfunctional benefits, the value the customer derives may derive from the brand rather than the product, and may even be attributable to the buying process rather than the product itself. The example given is the sense of social esteem people get from Starbuck's coffee - this esteem doesn't arise from the coffee, but the brand and store experience. (EN: this has changed, as SB has lost its cache, but it was certainly true at one time.)

They author also differentiates "emotional" benefits from "self-expressive benefits" - the first being derived from the experience, the second from being associated with the brand. (EN: these are one in the same, really. What's termed "self expression" is more accurately described as narcissism or esteem-by-proxy, which is a psychological benefit derived because the person holds themselves in higher esteem, and expects others do the same, due to their conspicuous consumption of a given brand.)

THE CUSTOMER-BRAND RELATIONSHIP STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT FORM

The author has put together a brainstorming tool for gathering information about the customer, the brand, and their relationship. The major sections of the questionnaire form pertain to the customer, the brand, competition, channels, message content, and long-term relationship.

The first set of questions pertains to the customer. In addition to traditional demographic segmentation, it explores the need they are seeking to fill, the products and brands they are currently using, how often they purchase, the strength of relationships with current suppliers, the level of thought put into selection and acquisition, how existing solutions might not be meeting their needs.

The second set of questions pertains to the brand. It looks at your specific brand and the market segment in question, and considers the quality and reputation of the brand from the perspective of those customers: what do they think of the brand, what qualities they associate with it, how their opinions and attitudes about brand were established. There are also introspective questions, such as what the marketer wishes that customers thought of the brand.

The third second pertains to competing brands: their market share, how customers perceive those brands, how the perception of competing brands compares to your own, how likely customers are to switch to other brands, etc.

The next section considers channels. Information about the company's attempts to communicate to the market can be listed, especially in determining whether the message is consistent. However, it should also include the channels through which competitors may be communication as well as the channels through which customers may receive information from others (e.g. broadcast media, bloggers, word-of-mouth, retail clerks), and to consider which of these channels has the greatest impact.

The next section considers message content: essentially, what is being said about the brand - but the company, by competitors, by distributors, by the general public - how much credibility and influence each source has, whether it supports or refutes official communications or the desired brand messages. In the end, the question is whether the messages fairly represent the brand value, and provide sufficient actionable information to enable the customer to obtain it.

Finally, the brand relationship is concerned, specifically focused on the long-term relationship the brand wishes to establish and maintain with the customer. Specifically, what do customers value about the brand that leads them to be loyal to it, what might increase or decrease that loyalty. In short, what's" in it" for them, and what vale they expect to receive in future as a reward for their continued loyalty.

(EN: The author stretches the chapter by providing a few hypothetical examples .... But I've never been a fan of that. The information above is clear enough that the concepts can be understood, and made-up examples to illustrate or "prove" the point only make it seem more contrived and specious, so I'm skipping them.)