jim.shamlin.com

Conclusion

While emotions are universal, the experience of emotion is highly idiosyncratic. We are not made angry by the same experiences, we do not feel anger to the same intensity, and we do not express anger in the same way. We are shaped by our culture, our peer groups, and our individual experience.

While the author began his research with a quest to find universals, he has not been successful in doing so - it is simply not in the nature of emotion. And the more you seek for universals, the less you will understand emotion.

It is also difficult to define emotions that are "normal" or "socially acceptable" - which itself is a redundancy as what is "normal" is determined in a social context. What is acceptable in one culture or group is not acceptable in another. To be accepted as normal, or to avoid being shunned as abnormal, requires patient observation to learn the norms of a group and tailor one's behavior accordingly.

And it is largely because of this group normalization and the tailoring of individual behavior that emotion is a social phenomenon rather than an individual one. We seldom express what we truly feel without considering whether it is acceptable in a group setting - and those that express their genuine emotion at all times may find it difficult to integrate into any society.

This works both ways: a social group who finds the emotional expression of an individual to be unacceptable may shun that person, but a person who finds the demands of a group in regard to emotional expression to be uncomfortable may decide not to become a member of that group.

Our natural tendencies, though they may suppressed or expressed in any context, become a sort of emotional profile. It is the emotional facet of their own personality.

There is a quick summary so some of the major points from previous chapters, which may be superficial and redundant, but here it is:

And finally, the author notes that the study of emotions is still in its early stages. There will be much more information in the future, which may agree with, refine, or contradict the ideas he has published in this book.